Now more than ever, there is substantial debate regarding whether one should enjoy art from artists who have behaved inappropriately. However, controversy surrounding an individual’s character or actions should not taint the public’s enjoyment of their art.
By refusing to support artists because of their behavior, people are erasing significant contributions artists have made to their industry. J.K. Rowling’s transphobia is awful, but it does not change the fact that she created arguably the most commercially successful young adult book series ever, “Harry Potter.”
Ye’s anti-Semitism and misogyny are inexcusable, but those actions do not change his revolutionary impact on modern rap and the fashion industry through the creation of Yeezy shoes and apparel.
According to Artspace, Pablo Picasso cheated on many wives, abused his son and portrayed himself as a god-like creature raping women in his pictures, but those actions were separated from his talent when looking at his role in advancing cubism and collage.
The accomplishments of Rowling, West and Picasso still deserve to be acknowledged despite their polarizing actions.
In addition, according to The Daily Free Press, not only are artists making money off their work themselves, but also the hundreds of people, whether that be production teams or even cashiers, who work for them. Protesting an artist by not buying their art can indirectly harm the lives of thousands of people who need jobs. Even if people choose to not purchase additional art, it is pointless to get rid of art they’ve already purchased.
Good art can stand alone, regardless of who created it. Art does not necessarily reflect its creator, and it is important to recognize that art made by controversial people can have positive impacts. For this reason, all art can be enjoyed without regard for its creator.
DREW
GRACIE
MEAD